Most nations see the defence of their safety as their primary goal. As such they construct sturdy army units and arm them with the most recent technology and weapons in pursuit of defence and protection.
Defense can also be an euphemism for battle, used by governments to reflect their non-aggressive posture in their area which doesn’t carry the adverse connotation of war, resembling Ministry or Department of Defense.
In military operations planning, a defensive technique is the policy of stopping an assault, or minimizing the damage of an assault, by the forces assuming protection in strategic depth for preventing an enemy from conquering territory. Throughout the scope of a nationwide defense policy, protection is used to include most army issues.
Defence techniques are employed by countries for various reasons. For instance, an excellent example of employing defensive technique ways could be seen when used in opposition to American soldiers within the Vietnam Conflict.
By means of smaller cell guerrilla forces the Vietcong waged a war on the assets of the American soldiers, which included destroying provides and supply routes. In addition they used the People assets when producing booby traps, including discarded items akin to tin cans in addition to unexploded bombs which they might collect and use for mines.
Eventually the efforts of the smaller mobile defensive guerrillas caused such an effect that the principle army was able to overrun the American forces with an enormous assault know because the Tet Offensive.
Nowhere is this example more outlined than in the Chilly Battle stand offs of the mid to late twentieth century. One specific instance of that is the Cuban Missile Crisis which concerned the US and the Soviet Union in 1962. The Soviet and Cuban authorities had placed nuclear weapons on Cuba as seen by American reconnaissance planes and, with the stress between the two nations already palpable, a standoff ensued with the ‘very real’ threat of a nuclear war occurring. Luckily diplomatic proceedings ensured that the crisis was settled comparatively amicably with the dismantling of the weaponry and a no-invasion agreement in place from the American authorities.
The role of military defence has been gradually shifted away from its primary role of providing security to enhancing commercial interest. With industrial growth and advancement of science and technology, the defence production led to a market oriented producer- purchaser relation between the developed and developing countries.The poor nation afflicted with conflicts became a super market for defence deals. For the powerful, military prowess which was earlier synonymous with political power has become a trademark of economic power.
But restraining factors were at work. The intellectual circle and the intelligence acquired from past experiences as also the active international diplomacy successfully trained the world community to disarm for peace and advancement. The agreement to network for prosperity through friendly trades and to resolve conflicts via peaceful dialogues have been endorsed emphatically.
History evidenced the worthless used of armed coercion. If a stick is given to a hungry man to stop him from his cry for hunger, he will roar to bite you and connive with the neighbor to cause disaster. Instead of using the resources to crush the anger, it would be wiser to use the resource to fill the hungry belly and teach the hungry man to grow crops to sustain his future needs. The resources used for military purchase can fruitfully be used for peace and development.
The political compulsions may tempt the authority to take pride in the toughness of the defence force. The military men pride themselves as the defenders of the nation. With due respect and regard to the defence services, I have a considered opinion to express. I think military might is an outdated idea of exalting the national self esteem. Recent history of military powers have confirmed the fatality of this approach. The pride of the nation is in the human asset and any nation that failed to nurture its most precious asset will lose its national pride even if it owns the most sophisticated war weapons to erase the entire human race.
Big defence budgets in the developed world may entail an economic investment return out of defence production and sale exports. But how long can this go on? For poor countries, big defence budget produces a negative return, and hits the belly of the poor as his pie is taken away with every military purchase.In the new age, the defence security trade mark will diminish as more focus is now on economic security and sustainability of the future. The creative and innovative thinking to meet the future challenges will be a supreme consideration while war weapons will be valueless in the approaching apocalypse.
And alas, it’s almost a pipe dream to talk about anyway, especially in the present period because let’s face it wars are not going away anytime soon. So we could easily be 100 or 200 years from now before humans stop having wars. And right now we have a bigger problem anyway and that is international terrorism and the prospects of a rogue nation state giving nuclear weapons to terrorists. We definitely need a defense system to track, and stop such terrorist events, especially on soft targets.
“But is it ever really possible to rationalize having them… In many ways I think not. It is Catch-22 for sure. If one have them, more will want to have them, since they get afraid of the one nation getting them in the first place. In the end it is only about killing in a big scale…” This is of course true, and I wish it weren’t, I wish we lived in a perfect world, but that’s not the world we live in, so we must protect ourselves.
In my personal library I have almost a whole row of books on the topic of nuclear proliferation, the Cold War, and many reports put forth during the Cold War by the Rand Corporation. I believe it is scary stuff, and it’s quite unfortunate, but it is what it is and we must deal with it without blinders. Please consider all this and think on it. If you have any comments, questions, or concerns you may e-mail me. I will not accept e-mails from anti-nuclear power activists.
Ms. Ebim has been writing about military news issues for numerous years. She considers herself an experienced segment commentator and enjoys her work a great deal. She specializes in researching all defence and military related issues and she tirelessly writes articles focused on the defence industry.
For anyone interested in learning more about how, please check out related Military Videos Welcome to a world of content!